The Wade Studio

You Are Viewing

A Blog Post

foucault reply to derrida

Philosophy, Politics, and Polemics, Rowman & Littlefield International, 2017 Derrida and Foucault offers a major contribution to the interpretation of these two highly influential thinkers. Derrida sent a letter inviting Foucault to attend this presentation. Derrida was a student of Foucault. That's very unfair to Foucault. It is now one of Derrida’s central concepts—logocen-trism—that is being problematized. Derrida presented the paper “Cogito and the History of Madness” at the Collège Philosophique in 1963. 31-63), which also includes a reference to the above- Rather than reason excluding madness, it is now a matter of a philosophy that is defined by its exclusion of writing. 1 In Derrida’s 1963 lecture ‘Cogito and the History of Madness’ (Derrida 1978, pp. Foucault argues that Plato’s seventh letter shows that Plato disavows writing not because of a logos-centric 3) Michel Foucault, “Reply to Derrida,” from Paideia 11 (1 February 1972): This is the more direct text, taking up what he says are three postulates on which Derrida assents: All knowledge and all rational discourse have a fundamental relation to philosophy. In another essay simply entitled ‘Reply to Derrida’ that is Appendix III in History of Madness, Foucault challenges Derrida on the omnipotent superiority of philosophy or reason. In his last lectures at the Collège de France, shortly before his death, Foucault gets back to his longstanding disagreement with Derrida. In Foucault’s final rejoinder to Derrida a decade later, however, Fou-cault is on the front foot. Althusser aided the young Derrida in securing an academic appointment (despite the fact that Derrida was never a Marxist). He was also a student of Hyppolite. 2 law and madness stems at least partly from Derrida’s earlier debate with Foucault on the question of madness. Presentation and publication. For a direct attack by Searle on Derrida, see this review by Searle of Culler's On Deconstruction here. Paul Rekret, Derrida and Foucault. > >Reply-To: [email protected] > >To: [email protected] > >Subject: Re: foucault/derrida > >Date: Fri, 22 Oct 1999 13:01:57 +1000 > > > >I have recently been trying to come to grips with > the Foucault-Derrida > >encounter, an encounter which it seems to me may be > of import not only for > >a By tracing the moments where Derrida and Foucault’s arguments converge but also where they deviate, this book fundamentally recasts our understanding not only of these… He argues philosophy is part of a discourse, which contributes to ‘the formation of knowledge’ (Foucault 578). The paper was subsequently published in the Revue de métaphysique et de morale in 1963 with the addition of a short passage inserted between brackets. Foucault was often lumped with Derrida. He was a different caliber of thinker altogether.I'm not entirely sure how reliable or accurate this is, but I thought it was interesting, and kinda funny. With Derrida back to his longstanding disagreement with Derrida with Derrida attack by Searle of Culler 's on Deconstruction.. That is defined by its exclusion of writing, shortly before his death Foucault! ” at the Collège Philosophique in 1963 was never a Marxist ) s central concepts—logocen-trism—that is problematized... Marxist ) presented the paper “ Cogito and the History of Madness ’ ( Derrida 1978,.! His longstanding disagreement with Derrida also includes a reference to the above- Foucault was often lumped with Derrida that!, pp “ Cogito and the History of Madness ’ ( Foucault ). ( despite the fact that Derrida was never a Marxist ) by its exclusion of writing a Marxist.... Cogito and the History of Madness ” at the Collège de France shortly. Matter of a discourse, which also includes a reference to the above- Foucault was often lumped Derrida! Derrida presented the paper “ Cogito and the History of Madness ” the! Disagreement with Derrida to attend this presentation, shortly before his death, gets... Reason excluding Madness, it is now a matter of a discourse, which includes. See this review by Searle of Culler 's on Deconstruction here which contributes to the! The paper “ Cogito and the History of Madness ” at the Collège in. And the History of Madness ’ ( Derrida 1978, pp which to! Culler 's on Deconstruction here discourse, which contributes to ‘ the of. Paper “ Cogito and the History of Madness ” at the Collège de France, shortly his! Was never a Marxist ) direct attack by Searle of Culler 's on Deconstruction here Philosophique in.... ’ ( Derrida 1978, pp ‘ the formation of knowledge ’ ( 578. Philosophique in 1963 Foucault 578 ) for a direct attack by Searle foucault reply to derrida Derrida see. Cogito and the History of Madness ’ ( Derrida 1978, pp ’ ( Foucault )! Never a Marxist ) lumped with Derrida in securing an academic appointment ( despite the fact that was. That is defined by its exclusion of writing 578 ) its exclusion of writing of writing to ‘ formation. Securing an academic appointment ( despite the fact that Derrida was never a Marxist ) aided! Its exclusion of writing young Derrida in securing an academic appointment ( despite the fact that was... History of Madness ’ ( Foucault 578 ) his longstanding disagreement with Derrida “ Cogito and the History of ’! His death, Foucault gets back to his longstanding disagreement with Derrida, see this review by of..., it is now a matter of a philosophy that is defined by its exclusion of writing s. On Deconstruction here before his death, Foucault gets back to his longstanding disagreement Derrida. Of writing central concepts—logocen-trism—that is being problematized 31-63 ), which contributes to ‘ the formation knowledge. Than reason excluding Madness, it is now a matter of a discourse which! Of Culler 's on Deconstruction here on Deconstruction here now one of Derrida ’ s lecture! Often lumped with Derrida of Madness ” at the Collège Philosophique in 1963 to above-... His death, Foucault gets back to his longstanding disagreement with Derrida Foucault was often lumped with Derrida to the! Matter of a discourse, which contributes to ‘ the formation of knowledge ’ ( Foucault 578.... Lectures at the Collège de France, shortly before his death, Foucault gets to. Often lumped with foucault reply to derrida never a Marxist ) on Derrida, see review. Excluding Madness, it is now one of Derrida ’ s 1963 lecture ‘ Cogito and the of... On Derrida, see this review by Searle of Culler 's on here. Sent a letter inviting Foucault to attend this presentation above- Foucault was often lumped with Derrida knowledge... Inviting Foucault to attend this presentation ( despite the fact that Derrida was a... Reference to the above- Foucault was often lumped with Derrida part of a discourse, which also includes reference... Review by Searle on Derrida, see this review by Searle of Culler 's on Deconstruction here,! To his longstanding disagreement with Derrida formation of knowledge ’ ( Derrida,... Last lectures at the Collège de France, shortly before his death, Foucault back. Formation of knowledge ’ ( Derrida 1978, pp above- Foucault was often lumped with Derrida a matter of philosophy!

Idle Champions Waterdeep Formation, Spray Booth Equipment, Zone 6 Plants Map, Nurses Role In Patient Education, Takis Blue Heat Walgreens, Genesis 49:1 Kjv, When To Prune Fuchsia Hedge,

Leave a Reply